TABLE 9-2 Cross-Tabulation of Participants by Two Categorical Variables
Health Insurance Type
Commercial Public Military Other Total
Urban-Rural Classification of Residence Rural
60
60
34
42
196
Urban 68
81
36
41
226
Total
128
141
70
83
422
After looking at the frequencies in Table 9-2, you may be curious about the percentages, which would
make these numbers more comparable. But a cross-tab can get very cluttered if you try to include them,
as there are different types: the column percentage, the row percentage, and the total percentage. For
example, the 60 rural residents with commercial health insurance in Table 9-2 comprise 46.9 percent
of all participants with commercial health insurance, because 60 divided by the total number with
commercial health insurance, which is 128 (the column total), equals 46.9 percent.
Groups are often compared across columns, and if that is the intention, column percentages should be
displayed. But if you divide these same 60 rural residents with commercial insurance by their row
total of 169 rural residents, you find they make up 30.6 percent of all rural residents, which is a row
percentage. And if you go on to divide these 60 participants by the total sample size of the study, which
is 422, you find that they make up 14.2 percent of all participants in the study.
Categorical data are typically displayed graphically as frequency bar charts and as pie charts:
Frequency bar charts: Displaying the spread of participants across the different categories of a
variable is commonly done by a bar chart (see Figure 9-1a). Generally, statistical programs are
used to make bar charts. To create a bar chart manually from a tally of participants in each
category, you draw a graph containing one vertical bar for each category, making the height
proportional to the number of participants in that category.
Pie charts: Pie charts indicate the relative number of participants in each category by the angle of
a circular wedge, which can also be considered more deliciously as a piece of the pie. To create a
pie chart manually, you multiply the percentage of participants in each category by 360, which is
the number of degrees of arc in a full circle, and then divide by 100. By doing that, you are
essentially figuring out what proportion of the circle to devote to that pie piece. Next, you draw a
circle with a compass, and then split it up into wedges using a protractor — remember from high
school math? Trust us, it’s easier to use statistical software.
Most scientific writers recommend the usage of bar charts over pie charts. They express more
information in a smaller space, and allow for more accurate visual comparisons.